The conversation became intense and greatly upset Joy. I was not home when the call was made having arrived toward the end of their conversation. As I listened, it became evident that the topic revolved around my daughter's separation and divorce, specifically regarding her ex-husband and the negotiations, particularly concerning child sharing arrangements. While SA and LM emphasised that their concern was primarily for the welfare of my grandchildren, it became apparent that their interests extended beyond this. The conversation also turned to other aspects of the divorce negotiations that were supposed to be confidential, only between the solicitors representing their clients and immediate family. They questioned how much our former son-in-law would receive as part of the divorce settlement and future child support payments, even suggesting that he might be financially incapable of meeting these obligations.
Without elaborating further, two fundamental and disturbing things became apparent. SA and LM were fully informed about all facets of the divorce negotiations between our daughter and her former husband, LR - his initials. Unbeknown to us, LR had been in regular contact with my wife's side of the family in the months leading up to this revelation. He divulged the details of an ongoing divorce negotiation, which at the time of this writing, was still active, thus initiating a situation that undermined the legal process. Additionally, he succeeded in persuading his audience to align with his perspective.
It appears that, from the perspective of the callers, my daughter, Joy and I have been and continue to be at fault regarding all aspects of the divorce proceedings. What astounds is how they could let someone outside of the family manipulate them such that they have turned on us. There is so much SA and LM do not know nor should they know. A divorce is difficult for any family. When news broke that our daughter and her now ex had split it was painful enough and many months of mental anguish consumed us. This anguish continues today accordingly, the last thing we need is more grief from extended family. Evidently we have been judged harshly. Did LR bother to outline how much we have done for him throughout the years, not to mention the love extended. Did he mention how we embraced him as family. Evidenced by our actions such as becoming guarantors for his loan for gender-affirming (sex change) surgery before he was even engaged to our daughter! Despite this, we wholeheartedly embraced both him and our daughter, who at the time was showing bisexual/pansexual characteristics. We accepted his diversity without judgment, unlike some who readily advocate for inclusion, but only until it personally affects them. How we willingly extended our support by assisting him in purchasing a car, covering car servicing expenses not merely bringing the car for servicing and returning it, mowing his lawn, and contributing significantly towards the purchase of a home, including additional expenses for landscaping, window shutters, air conditioning and other peripherals all in all totalling over $110,000. We also financially facilitated his journey to parenthood by covering all the expenses of multiple rounds of IVF treatments to the tune of just under $50,000. The result? Two wonderful kids.
Even after his separation and moving into rent our support continued unabated. We actively participated in overseeing trades work at his rental property on multiple occasions, funded plumbing services and a new tap installation, helped acquire household appliances like a new dryer, and even took care of repairs for his car, including a costly bonnet respray ($750). Remember what I did for Hunter's bike LR?
Furthermore, we anticipated his financial hardship in Nov 2023 due to placement and in good faith, offered $10,000 up front two months earlier - he never bothered to get back to us about that. We helped with practical tasks like assembling furniture and accompanying him to medical appointments. We were there for him in times of emotional distress, such as when his pet passed away and we cleaned everything up or when he needed assistance in a moment of vulnerability like being locked in the bathroom. Our commitment to his well-being was evident in our consistent offer to provide financial support whenever he found himself in need.
However, it appears unlikely that LR discussed these acts of kindness with SA or LM for that would make us look good, but more disappointingly his audience failed to question for there is always two sides to a story - Understanding is like a three-edged sword - it has your side, their side, and the truth that lies somewhere in between. They could have questioned and attempted to gather all the facts before forming conclusions. Regardless, despite our continuous support and genuine care, we are still viewed in a negative light. But, in reality, are we truly such terrible people? An independent legal arbiter would beg to differ.
Notwithstanding, the damage is done. Both SA and LM have passed judgement based on faulty premises without understanding the intricate financial details that led to the numbers being presented. Their intervention has already sparked a new wave of communications between the opposing legal parties, resulting in increased legal fees for our daughter, amounting to hundreds of dollars to date - now thousands! (April 2025). But the situation gets worse for SA and LM. Their unwitting intervention has emboldened LR, leading to extended time frames for the divorce negotiations and additional legal costs for our side of the family. Still, the repercussions extend beyond financial and timing factors. The final divorce settlement is now tainted, imposing additional and unplanned costs and compromised agreements regarding other elements of the separation. Moreover, we cannot overlook the psychological damage. Following that last phone exchange, Joy experienced sleepless nights and heightened anxiety and worry. These feelings of anxiety and mental strain persist many weeks and months later. To suggest that Joy was menaced by those phone calls is an understatement. As her many friends would attest to, she normally has an unswerving cheerful and convivial external disposition in quite nearly all circumstances within the public domain. This playful and cheerful demeanour is frequently exploited. Behind that jovial persona is a proud, confident, thoughtful, and very intuitive person with little need to lay claim, colour appearances or pretend about anything. After these events she is and remains livid at what her sisters have done.
I say to SA and LM and their families, move forward with your lives - forget about us, as we attempt to move on from you. You've made your choice and sided with the other party, abandoning an almost life long relationship in the process.
Instinctively, I believe SA and LM would stand unaffected amidst all this. Their self righteousness and sense of superiority was so evident during that call. Self-assurance stemming from where? Out-of-context recordings? What makes them so confident in their judgement? What information have they been exposed to, possibly even through digital means? Could LR be so cunning and devious to have gone down this path? I concede not knowing for certain, either way, it appears his audience let emotions rather than rational thought processes determine the outcome of their response to us.
Legal
It should be evident as what I am alluding to here. This ignorant and ultimately foolish intervention, or meddling, has led to unnecessary emotional suffering on our part, in addition to a compromised divorce settlement outcome and increased financial costs. At the time of this writing the extent of the material, financial and psychological damage is fluid and yet to be fully quantified but it will.
Civil law governs the rights and responsibilities of individuals in their interactions, hence I am contemplating my options. The legal system in Australia recognises personal injury in the form of emotional distress caused by others. Understandably, I will refrain from being specific here, but suffice to say that the actions of our extended family members specifically SA and LM and perhaps indirectly by a certain JA (our niece and daughter of SA) have had a profound adverse impact on our daily lives, including our relationships and work in addition to the divorce negotiations to date.
In the future, we will disengage entirely from SA, LM, and their families. Their words and behaviour have created impassable barriers between us, barriers that cannot be overcome - see my post Watch the words you speak.
Moving forward, I will be diligent and comprehensive in my preparations, relying on my patience and methodical approach. When fully prepared and dust has settled from the current situation, I have the option of choosing to pursue a course of action, which would involve consulting a reputable civil litigation lawyer.
If it goes down this path from my point of view it will be a case of, "Not my Circus, not my Monkeys".
So where to from here? Do I go legal or as challenging as it may be I embrace the virtue of equanimity - peak self worth. Here's the thing, I tend to default to the latter. No matter what I write from here on out, the most likely outcome is that nothing will happen beyond these words. As the saying goes, the best revenge is to have enough self-worth that you don't need to seek it. Operating from a higher mind is challenging at times, but it's infinitely more rewarding. Still, this blog is akin to a personal journal, a place where my thoughts live. So I'll keep writing, for the sake of record keeping and, expression of mind.
Epilogue Ch 1
If SA and LM were to find there way here by chance or design, I would want them to grasp the following:
"Recall all the information LR shared with you about us, verbal digital or otherwise. Everything! Every single detail, smear and critique. Have you ever questioned whether LR was entirely truthful? Have you considered the possibility of inaccuracies? Have you reflected on LR's potential motives for distorting truth? Have you applied critical thinking"? It seems you have not! This could cost you a significant sum"
Though, as I've written, it won't alter the current situation; the damage has been done.
Epilogue Ch 2
It is June 25, and my wife spoke with SA this past week. It was an unplanned conversation resulting from concerns over my mother in-laws health. The conversation didn't solve anything and only demonstrated how different our opinions are.
This situation has deeply affected us and unsettled our family. We are very disappointed with everyone involved. It's becoming clear that the option of legal action is getting firmer. Personally, I never want anything to do with them again.
Epilogue Ch 3
Our mediation session today (16 July, 2024) wasn't successful. Despite proposing five different child-sharing options, LR refused to budge on his preferred arrangement. It seems there's no room for negotiation. This will not bode well for him if the matter does go to family court.
However, there was a significant development. LR revealed details of a conversation that happened during our granddaughter's birthday in January 2025, despite not being present. Read that again, he was not present so how could he have known? This revelation, which he admitted came through LM, was also shared with our legal team. What a gift!
This confirms our suspicions that LM, SA and JA (my sisters in law and Joy's niece) have been interfering in our legal matters by discussing them with him. This behaviour is helpful as we move closer to suing.
As stated in the body of this writing, "At the time of this writing the extent of the material, financial and psychological damage is fluid and yet to be fully quantified." and, in Epilogue Ch 1, "This situation has deeply affected us and unsettled our family." I am compelled to add that due to the ongoing back and forth nature of the matter it has had a profound psychological impact on Joy, she is devastated and spiralling emotionally resulting, in great strain on our marriage.
If anything were to happen to her I will be unequivocal in my legal response by doing everything in my power to take LM, SA and JA to the cleaners.
Hopefully, they have competent legal representation for they will need it.
Epilogue Ch 4
New information has come to light regarding the actions of LR, which now include the appointment of a new legal team (based in Sunshine how coincidental) and a series of new financial demands. While this alone is not extraordinary, something else has emerged that suggests possible interference and influence involving SA, LM and, in particular, JA. Although details will not be disclosed here, this development bodes well for future civil actions against the individuals mentioned. It's shaping up to be very significant.
Updated: 01 May 2025